Grammarian pro5/2/2023 ![]() ![]() Although Justice Scalia suggests that Justice Stevens had a comma splice here instead, the quotation is wrong. The phrase “it turned” begins an independent clause, so it should follow a semi-colon. ![]() JUSTICE STEVENS can say again and again that Miller did “not turn on the difference between muskets and sawed-off shotguns, it turned, rather, on the basic difference between the military and nonmilitary use and possession of guns,” but the words of the opinion prove otherwise. Most curious misquotation of Justice Stevens’s dissent.The reader often has no idea what “this” means. 3Ī good rule: Never start a sentence with “this” unless you follow it with a noun. This is fully consistent with the ordinary definition of the militia as all able-bodied men. Many usage experts would require “whom” here, not “that,” because “scholar” is human.Ĭongress is given the power to “provide for calling forth the militia” and the power not to create, but to “organiz” it-and not to organize “a” militia, which is what one would expect if the militia were to be a federal creation, but to organize “the” militia, connoting a body already in existence. Most surprising violation of a traditional grammar rule by a known traditionalistĮvery late-19th-century legal scholar that we have read interpreted the Second Amendment to secure an individual right unconnected with militia service.Often, as here, only the second element of the pair works with the phrase that follows. ” This error is common in all such “double trouble” constructions, as I call them. You can’t very well say that “this holding is consistent with that the Second Amendment confers. “Positively suggests” properly introduces “that the Second Amendment,” but “not only consistent with” does not. This holding is not only consistent with, but positively suggests, that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to keep and bear arms (though only arms that “have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia”). Most surprising grammar error from a known grammarian.But if you want even more ammunition against the Court, I’ll share eight writing errors in the gun-ban opinion and dissents. More importantly, the Grammarian PRO macOS application comes with more than 200 inbuilt spelling and grammar rules designed to make it as simple as possible to always have 100% trust in the correctness of anything you're writing on your Mac.Īlso, Grammarian PRO will automatically correct your typos in real-time, as well as help you clean up any text you're writing with ease.This term, Chief Justice Roberts misquoted Bob Dylan, and Justice Kennedy ignored military death-penalty law. You can also use Grammarian PRO's built-in dictionary assistant to look up definitions and verify the correct choice of words.ĪutoCorrect allows its users to easily correct many spelling mistakes automatically as you type. ![]() Grammarian PRO is an application that provides its users with professional writing tools for combating those embarrassing writing errors that everyone tends to make, a universal interactive grammar checking, thesaurus, auto-correct and other similar features.įurthermore, Grammarian PRO was designed to work interactively or in batch correction mode and automatically starts working in your applications to correct spelling, grammar, phrase usage, and punctuation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |